by eliasen
8. juli 2009 20:07
Hi all
2 and a half year ago, I wrote a blog post about looping around elements, which can be found here: http://blog.eliasen.dk/2006/11/05/LoopingAroundElementsOfAMessage.aspx. In this post, I mention two ways to do something per element in a message. One is to use the XML (or flat file) disassembler to split the message into lots of messages and have them handled individually, and the other is to do it inside an orchestration.
Since then, BizTalk has been updated such that you can now call a receive pipeline from within your orchestration, which gives you the another way of looping through elements inside an orchestration.
Often times, in the forums, users are suggested to loop through elements of a message inside an orchestration. It is a fairly common approach if you want the subelements of a message handled in the correct order, for instance.
This post is to make sure people know that looping around a message inside an orchestration can have a serious performance impact.
Say you receive a large message – 100MB. You start looping around it inside an orchestration and split it up into, say, 1000 messages of 100k each. Then, for each message you call a web service or send out the message to some system. What will happen is, that the orchestration will persist its state after each send shape, meaning that the 100BM is written 1000 times to the messagebox. Persistence points are something you always need to be aware of when designing your orchestrations, and with messages of 100MB, even more so.
SO, don’t just loop around a message inside an orchestration because you can… do it when you absolutely have to.
Thanks
--
eliasen
2397e0ec-87a4-49a4-bd9a-6a2cd7c6f122|0|.0
Tags: